|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sgt Buttscratch
1475
   |
Posted - 2014.02.08 17:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
HYENAKILLER X wrote:Sir, why would you go heavy if not to use heavy weapons?
Due to very poor gungame the high EHP cushions them, while the AA takes care of the rest. In the gaming world this is referred to as a crutch.
The 2 weapons issue is not good, and CCP should have addressed this long before we saw rail rifles and wombat rifles. Allowing all heavies to run light weapons removes diversity and removes any point to having commandos.
I also thing turning speed of heavies fits should be slower than that of the scout.
I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas
Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans
|
Sgt Buttscratch
1475
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 17:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:HYENAKILLER X wrote:Sir, why would you go heavy if not to use heavy weapons?
Have you ever heard the word diversity? Plus, why does it matter? Some of our soldiers in present time wear Heavy Armor & use Light Weapons. Reason? It's just their preference. Same thing applies to Dust, you shape your character to be everything to have an edge on the Battlefield, i don't why people treat this as a foreign concept...
Everyone using 1 of 4 weapons is not diversity.......
Heavies with RR/CR/BR/SCR
Commando with RR/CR/BR/SCR
Assualt with RR/CR/BR/SCR
Logistics with RR/CR/BR/SCR
Scouts with RR/CR/BR/SCR
Not diverse. Nice try though, I love when people try that ****.
I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas
Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans
|
Sgt Buttscratch
1476
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 17:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:Sgt Buttscratch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:HYENAKILLER X wrote:Sir, why would you go heavy if not to use heavy weapons?
Have you ever heard the word diversity? Plus, why does it matter? Some of our soldiers in present time wear Heavy Armor & use Light Weapons. Reason? It's just their preference. Same thing applies to Dust, you shape your character to be everything to have an edge on the Battlefield, i don't why people treat this as a foreign concept... Everyone using 1 of 4 weapons is not diversity....... Heavies with RR/CR/BR/SCR Commando with RR/CR/BR/SCR Assualt with RR/CR/BR/SCR Logistics with RR/CR/BR/SCR Scouts with RR/CR/BR/SCR Not diverse. Nice try though, I love when people try that ****. I don't expect you to understand but, if people want to play as a Heavy with L Weapons then that's their preference, plus you may think it makes the Heavies OP, but their not really if you can exploit their weaknesses.
Preference does not equate to diversity, I am all for letting players play as they like, I can also fight against heavies with L weapons. Does not change the fact that its a crutch move by flakey players. It is also something that highlights the issues with roles in this game, when roles have no meaning, tactics are needless, one big sausage fight or no different to any other shooter. Dust514 was supposed to be a intense tactical shooter... It's not intense, and its not tactical. Its Meta game is flawed by simplifying roles/factions and even bloodlines.
The heavy with L weapons should be partof the game, but should not be the flagstone of poor design choice, lack of content and crutch players.
I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas
Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans
|
Sgt Buttscratch
1480
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Saxbrin Shain wrote:Sgt Buttscratch wrote:Allowing all heavies to run light weapons removes diversity [GǪ] It looks like you don't understand the meaning of "diversity". I encourage you to look it up, because giving Heavies more than two weapon choices only increases diversity. Sentinel suits are designed to amplify the wearer's strength to allow them to carry Heavy weapons. It makes sense that something strong enough to hold a Forge Gun would have no problems wielding a Rail Rifle GÇö whether you like it or not. If you have problems with the Rail Rifle, or any other weapon, propose changes to the weapons themselves. Taking rifles away from Sentinels won't make rifles any less FOTM.
Negative-
Heavies using more than 2 weapons does increase diversity.... for the heavies.
But in terms of ONLY INCREASES DIVERSITY, no. It actually decreases diversity overall forthe whole game. I look at everything thing as how it effects the game as a whole.
Allowing every role to be anything, removes roles...removes tictacs
I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas
Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans
|
|
|
| |
|